Most searched books

Archives

Action and Responsibility by Michael Bradie

By Michael Bradie

Ebook by way of Bradie, Michael

Show description

Read or Download Action and Responsibility PDF

Similar philosophy books

Time without Becoming

To take advantage of Alan Badiou's phrases, "It isn't any exaggeration to claim that Quentin Meillassoux has unfolded a brand new direction within the background of philosophy. " the current e-book, Time with out changing into, is the textual content of a convention that Meillassoux gave at Middlesex college in London in may possibly 2008. Following his seminal After Finitude, Meillassoux proceeds right here to extra discover his proposal of absolute contingency, which can produce and break, with out a cause, any turning into.

From Empedocles to Wittgenstein: Historical Essays in Philosophy

Sir Anthony Kenny provides a variety of his historic essays in philosophy. commonly they're all for 4 of the nice philosophers whom he such a lot esteems, specifically Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas, and Wittgenstein.

Awkwardness: An Essay

Argues that the awkwardness of our age is a key to realizing human adventure.

Philosophical Dimensions of the Neuro-Medical Sciences: Proceedings of the Second Trans-Disciplinary Symposium on Philosophy and Medicine Held at Farmington, Connecticut, May 15–17, 1975

Even though the research and rules of the colleges of the human brain seem to be the correct and sole crisis of philosophers, you spot that they're in a few half however so little overseas to the scientific discussion board that whereas anyone could deny that they're right to the general practitioner he can't deny that physicians have the obliga­ tion to philosophize.

Additional resources for Action and Responsibility

Example text

The validity of (A) seeros to me to be beyond dispute. No one is responsible for the fact that 49 x 18 = 882, for the fact that arithmetic is essentially incomplete, or, if Kripke is right about necessary truth, for the fact that the atomic number of gold is 79. ) The validity of (B) is a more difficult matter. I shall return to it later. 5 My argument will require t wo premises, 'NS' and 'NL'. The former is obviously true, since no human being is rnarally responsible for anything that occurred before any human beings had ever been.

It would be wrong and unwarranted to expect such a theory to make use of the ingredients that philosophical analysis has identified in the ordinary concept of action; it would be even more wrong to im pose this as a condition of adequacy on such theories- to say that no theory that does not make use of the conceptual apparatus of our ordinary action talk could be accepted as an adequate theory of action. 4 As an analogy, take the metaphysical theory of ordinary objects according to which such objects are "bare particulars" supporting qualities.

Since moral premises hear on the denial of freedom, an action can be both free and determined under appropriate moral assumptions. , in Aristotle and in Hume. Some discussions have a utilitarian thrust. Richman, for example, conceded that a determined action may be unavoidable; yet he insists that responsibility is not thereby eliminated. 2 The responsibility of the agent of an action he could not avoid doing is based upon the sum of observations regarding the usefulness and social necessity of the institution of responsibility.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.40 of 5 – based on 37 votes

Comments are closed.